首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessing and comparing the total antioxidant capacity of commercial beverages: application to beers, wines, waters and soft drinks using TRAP, TEAC and FRAP methods.
【2h】

Assessing and comparing the total antioxidant capacity of commercial beverages: application to beers, wines, waters and soft drinks using TRAP, TEAC and FRAP methods.

机译:评估和比较商业饮料的总抗氧化能力:使用TRAP,TEAC和FRAP方法应用于啤酒,葡萄酒,水和软饮料。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This work measures and tries to compare the Antioxidant Capacity (AC) of 50 commercial beverages of different kinds: 6 wines, 12 beers, 18 soft drinks and 14 flavoured waters. Because there is no reference procedure established for this purpose, three different optical methods were used to analyse these samples: Total Radical trapping Antioxidant Parameter (TRAP), Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) and Ferric ion Reducing Antioxidant Parameter (FRAP). These methods differ on the chemical background and nature of redox system. The TRAP method involves the transfer of hydrogen atoms while TEAC and FRAP involves electron transfer reactions. The AC was also assessed against three antioxidants of reference, Ascorbic acid (AA), Gallic acid (GA) and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl- 2-carboxylic acid (Trolox).The results obtained were analyzed statistically. Anova one-way tests were applied to all results and suggested that methods and standards exhibited significant statistical differences. The possible effect of sample features in the AC, such as gas, flavours, food colouring, sweeteners, acidity regulators, preservatives, stabilizers, vitamins, juice percentage, alcohol percentage, antioxidants and the colour was also investigated. The AC levels seemed to change with brand, kind of antioxidants added, and kind of flavour, depending on the sample. In general, higher ACs were obtained for FRAP as method, and beer for kind of sample, and the standard expressing the smaller AC values was GA.
机译:本工作测量并尝试比较50种不同类型的商业饮料的抗氧化能力(AC):6种葡萄酒,12种啤酒,18种软饮料和14种调味水。由于没有为此目的建立参考程序,因此使用了三种不同的光学方法来分析这些样品:总自由基捕获抗氧化剂参数(TRAP),Trolox等效抗氧化剂容量(TEAC)和三价铁离子还原抗氧化剂参数(FRAP)。这些方法在氧化还原系统的化学背景和性质上有所不同。 TRAP方法涉及氢原子的转移,而TEAC和FRAP方法涉及电子转移反应。还针对三种参考抗氧化剂抗坏血酸(AA),没食子酸(GA)和6-羟基-2,5,7,8-四甲基-2-羧酸(Trolox)对AC进行了评估。统计上。将Anova单向测试应用于所有结果,并建议方法和标准品表现出显着的统计学差异。还研究了AC中样品特征的可能影响,例如气体,调味剂,食用色素,甜味剂,酸度调节剂,防腐剂,稳定剂,维生素,果汁百分比,酒精百分比,抗氧化剂和颜色。交流水平似乎随品牌,添加的抗氧化剂种类和风味而变化,具体取决于样品。通常,FRAP方法获得的AC较高,而样品种类则获得啤酒,而AC值较小的标准为GA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号